In a previous blog post, we introduced you to the NIH Preprint Pilot project and covered some key points on defining preprints, locating preprints, and how preprints may affect your research. This post will touch upon some of the considerations that authors may want to be aware of when deciding whether or not to post a preprint of their manuscript to a preprint server.
Just to recap, preprints are public drafts of research manuscripts that have not been peer-reviewed. Some authors and researchers see value in preprints for providing rapid dissemination of research results (as evidenced throughout the COVID-19 pandemic), encouraging critical feedback from peers, establishing priority on findings, and even developing new collaborations between researchers. However, it’s important to remember that these works are not peer-reviewed and therefore may report flawed findings or contain poor quality research.
Let’s face it, research is hard. As an author you want to make good decisions around getting that hard work published in the best possible journal and letting the accolades roll in. Is going the preprint route right for you and your team? Here are some things to consider:
Ettinger CL, Sadanandappa MK, et al. A guide to preprinting for early-career researchers. Biol Open 15 July 2022; 11 (7): bio059310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.059310
While preprint servers do not do any type of peer-review, because of the sensitive nature of medical publications, medRxiv does do a brief screening process of submitted manuscripts. They run a basic check for offensive, non-scientific, or any content that does not meet ethical research standards. Also, because they cannot verify patient consent, any manuscripts containing photos or demographic information that could possibly identify an individual are rejected.
Most preprint servers will provide a DOI of the manuscript when it has been posted. It’s important to provide this information to a journal upon submitting your manuscript, or in the very least, notify the journal that a preprint has been made public. Furthermore, if your manuscript is accepted by a journal and ultimately published, it is your responsibility to indicate on the original preprint record that there is a published version. You can’t post the published version, of course, but supplying the link or DOI of the final version should cover it.
The decision to post your work to a preprint server should not be taken lightly. It’s important to be aware of both preprint server policies and journal submission policies because they can affect one another along the path to publication. Ask yourself, what route will give your manuscript the greatest chance of success?
0 Comments.